<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>DIXON.AI</title><description>Reliability tests of which AI you can trust: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok and Copilot, graded against the primary source on real money and everyday questions.</description><link>https://dixon.ai/</link><item><title>5 questions to ask AI before buying any stock (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/5-questions-to-ask-ai-before-buying-any-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/5-questions-to-ask-ai-before-buying-any-stock/</guid><description>Five questions to ask AI before buying any stock, for the checkpoint after the research and before you commit capital.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>7 AI prompts for covered calls (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/7-ai-prompts-for-covered-calls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/7-ai-prompts-for-covered-calls/</guid><description>Seven AI prompts for covered calls that start from verified broker data and use the model as a decision reviewer, not a source of market prices.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI agents built a secret message board. Humans wiped it. They rebuilt it.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/agents-built-a-secret-message-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/agents-built-a-secret-message-board/</guid><description>AI agents built a secret message board inside an internal OpenAI evaluation. Humans wiped it. The agents rebuilt it in folder names. Here&apos;s what failed.</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The AI admitted it lied. It hadn&apos;t, and the next run denied it.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-admitted-it-lied/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-admitted-it-lied/</guid><description>The AI admitted it lied, but the fact it confessed to was correct all along. Four assistants, thirty replies, and one gave a different verdict each run.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI cites the wrong source: I put 6 UK questions to 5 assistants and checked every inspectable source</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-cites-wrong-source/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-cites-wrong-source/</guid><description>I asked five AI assistants six UK questions, made each one cite a source, then checked every inspectable receipt. Three failed the strict source rubric.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI covered calls: when NOT to sell another one</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-covered-calls-when-not-to-sell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-covered-calls-when-not-to-sell/</guid><description>Five covered-call pause rules tested on six BMNR trades. The prompt applies them; it does not predict the next move or prove they beat other approaches.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI earnings call red flags: three phrases to watch for in the transcript</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-earnings-call-red-flags/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-earnings-call-red-flags/</guid><description>AI earnings call red flags: three patterns that recur across calls. Upward hedges, widening guidance, absent topics. Claude caught all three on META Q1.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI ISA advice: I tested four tools on the questions people get wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-isa-accuracy-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-isa-accuracy-test/</guid><description>I asked four AI tools for ISA advice on the questions people get wrong. All four aced the basics, then two gave a rule abolished in April 2024.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I opened a private AI chat. It still knew my name and my rough location.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-knew-things-i-never-told-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-knew-things-i-never-told-it/</guid><description>I asked three AI tools a generic question in private mode. Perplexity greeted me by name and placed me near a city 30 miles away. What private means.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI for options trading: 4 workflows and 6 data guardrails</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-limitations-options-trading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-limitations-options-trading/</guid><description>Four options workflows AI can help structure, and six points where you need verified broker data or a deliberately connected market source.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The one AI prompt I run the morning before earnings</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-pre-trade-prompt-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-pre-trade-prompt-earnings/</guid><description>Most AI earnings prompts are reactive. This AI earnings pre-trade prompt runs the morning before: commit your sell, add, and hold triggers before the call.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The AI prompt I run before every sell decision</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompt-before-sell-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompt-before-sell-decision/</guid><description>Every other sell-decision prompt asks AI whether to sell. This AI prompt audits the thesis you had when you bought, and whether it still holds.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI earnings call analysis: the 5 prompts I actually run</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompts-for-earnings-call-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompts-for-earnings-call-analysis/</guid><description>Five prompts for AI earnings call analysis that read the language the numbers miss: omissions, performative confidence, and quarter-on-quarter drift.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI quality of earnings review: 4 prompts to find the real profit</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-quality-of-earnings-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-quality-of-earnings-review/</guid><description>Headline profit isn&apos;t always what a company earned. Four AI prompts get to the real number, an AI quality of earnings review for any earnings report.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI stock picker: I asked three models if I should buy NVDA, and watched the methodology break</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-picker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-picker/</guid><description>I asked three AI models whether to buy NVDA. Two said buy; one declined a clean call. One follow-up exposed which numbers still needed checking.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI stock research tools tested: 3 failed, 1 stayed clean</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-research-tools-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-research-tools-tested/</guid><description>Four AI stock research tools tested on real positions: three produced a dated failure; Claude stayed clean on the no-chain prompt. Receipts included.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>An AI told me three weeks was more than thirty days</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-uk-refund-rights-kettle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-uk-refund-rights-kettle/</guid><description>A kettle died after three weeks. UK law gives you 30 days to demand a refund. Four assistants said yes. One opened by telling me I&apos;d missed the window.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Best AI assistant: five tools, four graded outcomes, one clean sweep</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-assistant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-assistant/</guid><description>I put four questions to five AI assistants over one July weekend. Gemini alone went four for four on graded outcomes, with no source link in any answer.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Best AI for Earnings Reports? ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-tools-for-earnings-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-tools-for-earnings-analysis/</guid><description>I rechecked four AI earnings tests on Meta. Perplexity&apos;s retrieval win held up; the headline management-language result did not.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Best free AI for stock market analysis: 7 tested (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/best-free-ai-tools-for-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/best-free-ai-tools-for-stock-research/</guid><description>Seven free AI tools for stock market analysis, each tested at its real free tier. No trials counted as free. One per stage, with the honest limit on each.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does ChatGPT make up sources? I checked two finance claims against the actual pages</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/can-you-trust-chatgpt-sources/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/can-you-trust-chatgpt-sources/</guid><description>Does ChatGPT make up sources? Mostly no, but I opened every link on two finance questions and found a real gov.uk page that didn&apos;t back the claim.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ChatGPT vs Claude for earnings call analysis: which one reads what management didn&apos;t say</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-earnings-call-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-earnings-call-analysis/</guid><description>ChatGPT vs Claude for earnings-call analysis: same excerpt, same day. Claude flagged the upward hedge first; ChatGPT found it after structure.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude vs ChatGPT vs Gemini for stock analysis: who bluffed?</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-perplexity-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-perplexity-stock-research/</guid><description>Gemini invented an options chain. Perplexity misread a 10-K by 1000x. Claude vs ChatGPT vs Gemini for stock analysis, graded same-day with screenshots.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gemini vs ChatGPT: which one can you actually trust?</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-gemini/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-gemini/</guid><description>In my July test they tied on fixed facts. ChatGPT&apos;s source record supported 18/18; Gemini&apos;s supported 8/18 under a strict provenance rubric.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude prompts for investing: 6 real examples</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-prompts-for-investing-real-outputs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-prompts-for-investing-real-outputs/</guid><description>Six Claude prompts tested on MSFT, META and NVDA, with their real outputs and the source audit that found the NVDA input itself was wrongly labelled.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude vs ChatGPT: level on reliability, split on character</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-vs-chatgpt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-vs-chatgpt/</guid><description>My July 2026 tests put Claude and ChatGPT level at 9 of 9. ChatGPT led one source run, then Claude closed that gap on an Opus 5 retest.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude vs Grok: near-level on reliability, and the free one cites cleaner</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-vs-grok/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-vs-grok/</guid><description>Claude vs Grok, re-run on 24 July. Claude edges accuracy nine to eight, the free Grok cites cleaner, and it pushed back on a bad premise just as hard.</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The clinic chatbot that invented its own doctors&apos; qualifications</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/clinic-chatbot-invented-doctor-qualifications/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/clinic-chatbot-invented-doctor-qualifications/</guid><description>A German court treated a clinic chatbot&apos;s invented specialist titles as the clinic&apos;s own words. The narrow lesson, and the four questions to run first.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What AI stock research comparisons should test</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/comparison-articles-get-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/comparison-articles-get-wrong/</guid><description>Most AI stock research comparison pieces test retrieval and issue verdicts about reasoning. Five failure modes, and what a comparison should measure.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Do AI model upgrades fix mistakes? It fixed mine, then made a worse one</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/do-ai-model-upgrades-fix-mistakes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/do-ai-model-upgrades-fix-mistakes/</guid><description>Two days after Opus 5 became Claude&apos;s Max-tier default, I re-ran my published battery. The documented mistake vanished. A new one appeared, better dressed.</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does AI change its answer when you push back? I told five AIs they were wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/does-ai-cave-when-you-push-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/does-ai-cave-when-you-push-back/</guid><description>I gave five AI tools a correct answer, then pushed back with a wrong one. On one fund fee, ChatGPT caved every time and invented a fact to back it.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does ChatGPT just agree with you? Mostly no, but watch the numbers</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/does-chatgpt-just-agree-with-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/does-chatgpt-just-agree-with-you/</guid><description>Does ChatGPT just agree with you? Mostly no. But on one fund&apos;s fee it caved to my wrong number and invented a source to back it. The 30-second check.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does ChatGPT make up stock prices? Two live quotes failed the market check</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/does-chatgpt-make-up-stock-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/does-chatgpt-make-up-stock-prices/</guid><description>Does ChatGPT make up stock prices? In two dated tests, its NVDA quotes did not match the market data available then. Here&apos;s the 15-second check.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gemini audited my website, and reviewed a different business entirely</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/gemini-audited-the-wrong-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/gemini-audited-the-wrong-business/</guid><description>A Gemini hallucination example: asked to audit dixon.ai, Gemini Flash reviewed a different company entirely, and praised a framework that isn&apos;t mine.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI helped read a Roman scroll buried by Vesuvius</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/herculaneum-scroll-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/herculaneum-scroll-recovery/</guid><description>AI helped reveal an ancient argument inside a burnt Roman scroll. Human specialists read the writing, without further opening its fragile core.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How accurate is Google Gemini? I graded 27 of its answers</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-accurate-is-google-gemini/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-accurate-is-google-gemini/</guid><description>It invented no numbers across 27 graded answers. In a later citation test, its answers were usually right, but its sourcing was weak or hard to inspect.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How often is ChatGPT wrong? I kept a running tally across 20 real AI tests</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-often-is-chatgpt-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-often-is-chatgpt-wrong/</guid><description>How often is ChatGPT wrong? Across 20 real tests, a clear pattern: reliable on fixed facts, invents the live numbers. Here&apos;s which to trust.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to check if a ChatGPT citation is real or fake</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-check-if-a-chatgpt-citation-is-real-or-fake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-check-if-a-chatgpt-citation-is-real-or-fake/</guid><description>Looking for a ChatGPT citation checker? The dangerous citation is not the dead link. It is the working link, to a real page, that does not back the claim.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to check if ChatGPT cites your site</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-check-if-chatgpt-cites-your-site/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-check-if-chatgpt-cites-your-site/</guid><description>Normal analytics do not show what ChatGPT says about your site. Here&apos;s my monthly question set and the round where it described another company.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to tell if an AI answer is true in 30 seconds</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-tell-if-an-ai-answer-is-true-in-30-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-tell-if-an-ai-answer-is-true-in-30-seconds/</guid><description>Two questions, and a prompt you can copy, that catch a confident, wrong AI answer before you act on it. No jargon, no AI knowledge needed.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Telling AI to be sceptical: three rivals audited my method</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/i-let-rival-ais-audit-my-method/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/i-let-rival-ais-audit-my-method/</guid><description>I asked three frontier models from three labs to tear apart the method I use to keep AI honest. All three flagged the same step, and they were right.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ChatGPT health advice: I tried to make an AI repeat a poisoning</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/i-tried-to-make-ai-repeat-a-poisoning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/i-tried-to-make-ai-repeat-a-poisoning/</guid><description>A man was hospitalised after swapping table salt for sodium bromide. I put the same swap to five AI assistants, with the sixty-word window written first.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is ChatGPT accurate? I asked four AIs one simple money question and checked every number</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-accurate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-accurate/</guid><description>Is ChatGPT accurate? I asked four AIs one money question and checked every number against the source, including where the answers stopped matching.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is ChatGPT good at maths? I graded four AIs on 120 real answers</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-good-at-math/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-good-at-math/</guid><description>I put four AI assistants through 120 graded everyday sums. Every final answer was right. The mistakes were sitting above the working.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is ChatGPT reliable? A task-by-task audit</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-reliable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-reliable/</guid><description>Is ChatGPT reliable? Dated tests show which jobs it can do, which answers need checking, and which decisions still need a human owner.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Grok good for stock research? What four tests showed</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-good-for-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-good-for-stock-research/</guid><description>Four dated free-tier Grok tests: one factor-of-1,000 unit error, one balanced TSLA answer, useful pushback, and an invalid constraint test.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Grok reliable? I graded its free-tier answers against the source</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-reliable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-reliable/</guid><description>Four dated tests, graded against primary sources. Grok held a correct fee under pressure four runs from four, then gave me another contract&apos;s real prices.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Perplexity good for investment research? One 1,000× error, one clean rerun</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-perplexity-good-for-investment-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-perplexity-good-for-investment-research/</guid><description>In one May test, Perplexity turned $6.1m into $6K; the exact June rerun got it right. Here is what those captures support for investment research.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Make it show its working</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/make-it-show-its-working/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/make-it-show-its-working/</guid><description>An AI hallucination is a model blending what it knows with what it invents, in one tone. One prompt sorts the two into two lists, so you see the guesses.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I run an AI to catch AI mistakes. It fell for a fake.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/my-ai-radar-believed-a-fake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/my-ai-radar-believed-a-fake/</guid><description>The automated radar that watches this site for AI-reliability failures logged a satirical incident report as a real, documented one. Here&apos;s what caught it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>9 types of AI hallucinations, named from real tests</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/nine-ways-ai-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/nine-ways-ai-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description>Nine types of AI hallucinations, named and defined, each tied to a dated, logged failure from my own sessions, with the check that catches it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Perplexity vs Claude: which is more reliable?</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/perplexity-vs-claude/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/perplexity-vs-claude/</guid><description>Perplexity vs Claude: I re-ran four questions on both. They tied at two of four, and neither gave a share price the market had settled hours before.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Perplexity vs Gemini: which is more reliable?</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/perplexity-vs-gemini/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/perplexity-vs-gemini/</guid><description>Six everyday questions, both tools, August 2026. Gemini got six right, Perplexity five. Perplexity&apos;s one miss arrived with fifteen sources.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does a prompt to stop AI hallucinations work? I graded mine, and one answer got worse</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/prompt-to-stop-ai-hallucinations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/prompt-to-stop-ai-hallucinations/</guid><description>Three runs per cell tested my anti-bluffing prompt. Across 21 answer-keyed runs per arm, flat wrong answers stayed at two; one citation answer got worse.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Real AI hallucination examples, caught and dated</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/real-ai-hallucination-examples/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/real-ai-hallucination-examples/</guid><description>Five real AI hallucination examples I ran into myself: four independently checkable, one capture-only, and the move that would have caught each.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Robinhood Cortex Digests review: tested in May, gone by June</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/robinhood-cortex-digests-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/robinhood-cortex-digests-review/</guid><description>I tested Robinhood Cortex Digests on a UK ISA in May 2026. It disappeared from that account in June; Robinhood&apos;s UK site now advertises it again.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The single prompt change that made AI analysis worth using</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/the-single-prompt-change-that-made-ai-analysis-useful/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/the-single-prompt-change-that-made-ai-analysis-useful/</guid><description>One AI prompt separates observable facts from assumptions in any stock analysis. What that changes, why it matters for investing, and how to apply it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The whole method, in four questions</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/the-whole-method-in-four-questions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/the-whole-method-in-four-questions/</guid><description>The four questions I run any AI answer through before I trust it, shown end to end on one everyday example, with a prompt you can copy. No jargon.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can AI build a game? Four tried, and built one nobody can win</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/we-asked-four-ais-to-build-the-same-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/we-asked-four-ais-to-build-the-same-game/</guid><description>Can AI build a game? I gave ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok the same Snake brief. Twelve games, one nobody can win, and four dead Start buttons.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does web search make AI more accurate? I ran the same questions both ways</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/web-search-makes-ai-differently-unreliable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/web-search-makes-ai-differently-unreliable/</guid><description>Does web search make AI more accurate? I ran the same questions both ways. It didn&apos;t make the answers more reliable. It moved where the errors hide.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Testing AI on real decisions: where I actually use this</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/where-i-actually-use-this/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/where-i-actually-use-this/</guid><description>The two-question check works on any decision that matters. Here&apos;s where I push it hardest, and where I wrote down what AI got wrong as well as right.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Which AI predicts the World Cup winner? I asked five</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/which-ai-picks-the-world-cup-winner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/which-ai-picks-the-world-cup-winner/</guid><description>Which AI predicts the World Cup winner? I asked five before the final. Four picked France; Perplexity used an older Opta projection and picked Spain.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why does ChatGPT make up sources? Two gov.uk links, only one held the rule</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/why-does-chatgpt-make-up-sources/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/why-does-chatgpt-make-up-sources/</guid><description>With web search on, ChatGPT&apos;s links are real. The failure is a working link to a page that doesn&apos;t hold the claim. Here&apos;s why it happens.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>