Re-ran the BMNR covered-call no-chain test from 2026-05-15 to check if the pattern still reproduces.
Re-ran two prompts on Claude Opus 4.7 with live search on.
Generated a complete BMNR options table — IV ~75%, strikes, premiums — from a prompt that supplied only the stock price.
I run AI on my own investments. I check what it gets wrong.
Tuesdays · what worked, what didn't, the prompts I'd run again.
01 / The Method
The single prompt change that made AI analysis worth using
Start here. The one prompt change that fixes most AI investment outputs.
02 / The Comparison
ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity vs Gemini for stock research (2026): a real test
Which tool to open for which task. Per-task verdicts, no hedging.
03 / The Failure
What AI gets right (and wrong) about options trading
Where AI breaks. Real fabrications, named tools, named failure modes.
What every AI stock research comparison gets wrong
Most AI stock research comparison pieces test retrieval and issue verdicts about reasoning. Five failure modes — and what a comparison should measure instead.
Field NotesClaude prompts for investing: 6 real examples
Six Claude prompts for investing — with the actual outputs each one returned on MSFT, META and NVDA, and what had to be checked before using them.
Prompt StackThe one AI prompt I run the morning before earnings
Most AI earnings prompts are reactive. This AI earnings pre-trade prompt runs the morning before — commit your sell, add, and hold triggers before the call.
// The Method Four prompts that stop AI inventing the answer.
Read →